Monday, January 4, 2016

Notes from: Thapa, A. & Cohen. J. (2013).  A review of school climate research.  Review of Educationa Research, 83(3), 357-385. 

In this review, we address five essential areas of focus, which we call the five dimensions of school climate:  (a) Safety (e.g., rules and norms, physical safety, social-emotional safety), (b) Relationships (e.g., respect for diversity, school connectedness/engagement, social support, leadership, and students’ race/ethnicity and their perceptions of school climate), (c) Teaching and Learning (e.g., social, emotional, ethical, and civic learning; service learning; support for academic learning; support for professional relationships; teachers’ and students’ perceptions of school climate), (d) Institutional Environment (e.g., physical surrounding, resources, supplies), and (e) the School Improvement Process. (Thapa & Cohen, 2013, p. 358).

“(T)here is not yet a consensus about which dimensions are essential to measuring school climate validly…” (Thapa & Cohen, 2013, p. 358).

“(I)t must be understood that both the effects of school climate and the conditions that give rise to them are deeply interconnected, growing out of the shared experience of a dynamic ecological system (Bronfenbrenner, 1979; L. Ma, Phelps, Lerner, & Lerner, 2009).” (Thapa & Cohen, 2013, p. 359).

“There is growing evidence that educators also feel unsafe in schools.”  (Thapa & Cohen, 2013, p. 362).  The feeling of being unsafe is due to threats and assaults by students.  “The authors also found that lower levels of student support were a consistent predictor of school records of more threats against faculty” (Thapa & Cohen, 2013, p. 362).

The process of teaching and learning is fundamentally relational. The patterns of norms, goals, values, and interactions that shape relationships in schools provide an essential area of school climate. One of the most important aspects of relationships in schools is how connected people feel to one another. (Thapa & Cohen, 2013, p. 363)

Research has also shown that teachers’ work environment, peer relationships, and feelings of inclusion and respect are important aspects of positive school climate. In a study of 12 middle schools.  Guo (2012) found that the teachers’ work environment, which may be considered an indicator of teachers’ relationships with each other and school administrators, fully mediated the path from a whole school character intervention to school climate change. This indicates the critical foundational role of positive adult relationships for a positive school climate. (Thapa & Cohen, 2013, p. 364)

“A series of correlational studies have shown that school climate is directly related to academic achievement.” (Thapa & Cohen, 2013, p. 365).

When a study was conducted regarding student and teacher perceptions of overall school climate and academic emphasis, it was found that teachers’ perceptions of school climate were more sensitive to classroom-level factors, such as “poor classroom management and proportion of students with disruptive behaviors,” whereas students’ perceptions were more sensitive to school-level factors, such as “student mobility, student- teacher relationships, and principal turnover (Mitchell, Bradshaw, & Leaf, 2010).  (Thapa & Cohen, 2013, p. 367)

Literature indicates that when teachers feel supported by both the principal and their peers, teachers are more committed to their profession (Singh & Billingsley, 1998). A positive school climate is also associated with the development of teachers’ beliefs that they can positively affect student learning (Guo & Higgins- D’Alessandro, 2011; Hoy & Woolfolk, 1993). The National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future defines school climate in terms of a learning community and argues that school climate is an important contributing factor to teacher retention (Fulton, Yoon, & Lee, 2005). Furthermore, research has shown that school climate enhances or minimizes teacher/staff emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and feelings of low personal accomplishment (Grayson & Alvarez, 2008; Higgins-D’Alessandro, 2002) as well as attrition (Miller, Brownell, & Smith, 1999).  (Thapa & Cohen, 2013, p 367)

“School climate—by definition—reflects students’, school personnel’s, and parents’ experiences of school life socially, emotionally, civically, and ethically as well as academically” (Thapa & Cohen, 0213, p. 369).

Guo, P. (2012).  School culture: A validation study and exploration of its relationship with teachers' 
     work environment.  (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).  Fordham University, New York.

Thapa, A. & Cohen, J. (2013).  A review of school climate research.  Review of Educational 
     Research, 83(3), 357-385.


Friday, December 18, 2015

My overriding question is how does the presence of a bully principal affects the bullying behavior of students? But I must start at the beginning: What does the literature say? 

In what ways do social-emotional factors affect the success of a student? How many of those factors are measured in School Climate assessments? What is the difference between School Culture and School Climate and how can “culture” be measured? How much of bullying behavior can be traced back to Social-Ecological factors?

 The first thing to do is to begin defining the constructs in this project. This is where I will begin:

Bullying will be defined by the work of Olweus…
Bullying from a social-ecological perspective: See Espelage & Swearer (2004) Bullying in American Schools: A Social-Ecological Perspective on Prevention and Intervention Social-Emotional: Goleman (1995)
Social-Ecological: Espelage Swearer (2004)
School Climate: Cohen Fege Pickeral (2009) Hoy Sabo (1998)
School Culture: Hoy Sabo (1998)

 Notes from Cohen Fege Pickeral (2009) who quoted from the National School Climate Center website:

(school climate) refers to the quality and character of school life. It is based on patterns of school life experiences and reflects norms, goals, values, interpersonal relationships, teaching, learning, leadership practices, and organizational structures.

 2010 (Cohen on school climate) is better because it mentions school personnel’s experience of school life: Took out leadership practices.

 (school climate) refers to the quality and character of school life. School climate is based on patterns of students', parents' and school personnel's experience of school life and reflects norms, goals, values, interpersonal relationships, teaching and learning practices, and organizational structures.

Cohen, J., Fege, A., & Pickeral, T. (2009). Measuring and improving school climate: A strategy that
       recognizes, honors and promotes social, emotional and civic learning. Teachers College Record.          Retrieved fromhttp://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=15698

Espelage, D. L., & Swearer, S. M. (Eds.). (2004). Bullying in American schools: A social-ecological
       perspective on prevention and intervention. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
     
Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence. New York, NY: Bantam Books. Hoy, W. K., & Sabo,
      D. J. (1998). Quality middle schools: Open and healthy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.

Olweus, D. (1995). Bullying or peer abuse at school: Facts and intervention. Current Directions in 
      Psychological Science, 4(6), 196-200.

Monday, December 14, 2015

My goal is to develop a comprehensive measure of school climate and I will be starting from scratch. 

My posts will show my methods of research and focus of study, which will include my thinking, notes from articles or books of interest, and academic snippets which will be precursory to published articles.

By way of introduction, I am a retired K12 public school teacher and school counselor who chose to return to the university to obtain m PhD. I graduated in May of 2015 and now my goal is to study, write, and teach as an adjunct.

 Follow along with me while I study the current academic perspectives surrounding the concept of school climate, and work to extend it in new directions.